By: Diane Benjamin
Children Shouldn’t Get COVID-19 Vaccines, Harvard Professor Says
Excerpt:
Children are more likely to contract serious disease or die from the annual influenza, or the flu, than COVID-19, according to data and studies that Kulldorff has reviewed. Just 195 children under the age of 4 and 442 between 5 and 18 have died from COVID-19 in the United States as of Oct. 20, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Children are 15 times less likely to be hospitalized with the disease than individuals who are 85 or older, and 570 times less likely to die, the agency says.
“One example is from Sweden, during the first wave in the spring of 2020, which affected Sweden quite strongly,” Kulldorff said. “But Sweden decided to keep daycare and schools open for all children ages 1 to 15. And there are 1.8 million such children who got through the first wave without vaccines, of course, without masks, without any sort of distancing in schools.
“If a child was sick, they were told to stay home. But that was basically it. And you know how many of those 1.8 million children died from COVID? Zero. Only a few hospitalizations. So this is not a risky disease for children.”
Below is a short video from the Global COVID Summit held in Bloomington last Saturday. The speaker is Dr. Richard Urso, He his 100% against vaccinating kids! The quality of the video isn’t great, especially when the crowd stood up in support, the audio is very clear however. Dr. Urso has testified before Congress, see those video on YouTube or Rumble
Some points from what I saw here and have read about vaccines.
There are very good reasons, it takes the FDA on average 10.5 years for a Phase I program (trial on a few hundred people) and then progress to 2 more phases of trials before regulatory approval. We are all still in what is a typical trial phase for vaccines and will be for years.
Are the scientists confident that the vaccine that was approved in 9 months is safe? No
Should we enlist our unaffected children into this trial? No
Should we give them an experimental shot for a version of the virus that is no longer around? No
Readers may not understand the last point. To clarify, the “vaccine” was developed for the initial strain. Delta has replaced it now. If people don’t see a few months of testing says nothing about the long term effects they aren’t thinking.
Yes, one of the scientists put it this way. Its like saying – we have a bunch of vaccine left over from last year’s virus. Lets use it up on the new virus that is spreading this year.
Maybe that’s what they are doing with our kids? Dilute down the old stuff we have on the shelf now and use it up on the children.
Why not. The kids don’t get sick anyway. Who will know? Big Pharma Bingo. $$$$$$
“Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.”
― Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto
Yeah, the Communists/Marxists/Alinsky Radicals want to have the exclusive right to exploit the children.
The topic should be “Who will care for your children when you are gone”
“ERs are now swamped with seriously ill patients — but many don’t even have COVID”
NPR can’t figure out what is going on? It’s a mystery…
https://knpr.org/npr/2021-10/ers-are-now-swamped-seriously-ill-patients-many-dont-even-have-covid
Vaccine weakens the immune system to fight other diseases. It’s a secret however.
Here is the “actual science” about what is most likely happening:
“Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220307311