Monday’s Agenda: approve Wire Transfers

By:  Diane Benjamin

Nobody gets fired.  David Hales isn’t held responsible.  It was just an accident that Wire Transfers weren’t brought to the Council for approval for YEARS.

Nobody’s fault, just slipped through the cracks.

Monday night THIS Council is asked to approve Wire Transfers from 2013, 2014, and 2015.

They all weren’t members of the Council at that time, I wonder if only the long-timers will vote.  I doubt it – it’s on the Consent Agenda where their vote is supposed to be an automatic YES.  Somebody could “PULL” it and ask why nobody is accountable.

We will never know if somebody would have noticed BIG payments to IMRF if the Transfers had been legally brought to the Council.  We will never know if Emily Bell could have been stopped from costing you BIG bucks.  Others could have been stopped too.

But it’s nobody’s fault, and nobody is accountable.

Click here to see the applicable section from the meeting packet:  Wire Transfers

There are other items that should be questioned – FOIA away people.

I think some are still missing from 2012, but what’s thousands of dollars between friends.

“It was recently brought to their attention . . . ”

Thanks for the credit folks.

 

12 thoughts on “Monday’s Agenda: approve Wire Transfers

    1. From the packet– “If an expenditure is not within the existing budget or budget authority, the expenditure reverts back to Council to approve a budget amendment. Accordingly, these electronic transactions go through a multi-level internal approval process and are reported monthly in the monthly financial report to Council.”

      They can’t even keep the lies straight.

    1. I was wondering what exactly would happen if the council failed to approve the payments. The city is legally obligated to pay them. Had they voted no before the payments were made, I’m guessing the IMRF would sue to collect the money. If they don’t approve them now, what happens? Do we ask for the money back? Personally I think they should be approved and either Hales pay is reduced or he is asked to resign.

      1. Interest is charged for “late” PENALTY payments. No one is trying to (illegally) prevent the retirees from getting their pensions. A change in City policy should have been made in 2012 and there wouldn’t have been any penalties to pay.

Leave a Reply