County Land Use problem

By:  Diane Benjamin

I FOIA’d the bills paid by the Land Use Committee since nothing was included in the meeting documentation.  See what was paid here:  FOIA_land_use_bills_-_redacted

The only thing redacted was the chairman’s signature, the County got the information to me the same day I filed it.  I hope in the future it’s just included with meeting docs on the website.  The Pantagraph got a huge chunk for classified ads.  Between the County and advertising entertainment for Bloomington and Normal, of course they will never report anything but what they are told.

Note:  Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals are appointed, not elected.  They are the ones approving wind and solar farms all over the county.

Here’s why I was at this meeting.  A landowner east of town is upset that he was told for years by Philip Dick, secretary of the Zoning Board of Appeals, that no more houses could ever be built on around 200 acres known as the Cowden property.  Cowden is deceased and I think 5 other families own parts of the acreage.  Phillip Dick repeatedly told the owners only 1 house was allowed for every 40 acres.  Some exceptions for family members have been made at great expense (mostly surveys and driveways) to the family that contacted me.  Father and son now both have houses on the property.

One of the property owners held 99 acres plus a house.  He wanted to build another house for a family member, Phil Dick told him NO.  The guy has since sold the property and moved to Wisconsin.  The new buyers are now building a large house.

People don’t move to the country to have neighbors right on top  of them.  They shoot on their property.  They burn on their property.  Freedom exists in the country that does not exist in town.

So how did the new owners get permission to build?  They didn’t.  The law in Illinois is if you own more than 40 acres you can do anything with it you want including building without permits.  The only permit they will need is access to a Township road, another problem since where they want to put it will be hazardous to themselves and other traffic, including school buses.  That issue is still being discussed.

The guy that sold evidently didn’t know he didn’t need Phil Dick’s approval to build and Phil Dick didn’t tell him.

The saga gets worse though.  The new owner may want to build additional houses on the acres left – also over 40.  The family I talked to thinks the place they are looking to build is in their front yard, they don’t own all the property directly between them and the street. They haven’t lived in the country for many decades to end up living in a subdivision without ever moving.  The new owner paid cash for the property, so building without loans and title work may not be a problem.

Currently there is nothing in the law to stop this.  At some point the County could accuse them of creating an unauthorized subdivision, but by then 2 or 3 houses could be built.  The family I talked to could lose the right to use their property the way they have for many decades.

The family is also aware of another area farmer attempting to sell “lots”.  If he is selling 40 acre tracts there is nothing to stop him either.

The 40 acre rule is State law.  It voids all County ordinances.  Nobody wants to deny a farmer giving property to a relative who works the farm with him.  Coming up with a legal way to prevent the country turning into a big subdivision won’t be easy without infringing on the rights of family farms.

We couldn’t think of a fix for this problem.  The Zoning Board of Appeals needs to work on it.

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “County Land Use problem

  1. ZBA & county board don’t care about wind turbines infringing upon the property rights of others whose property lies under the 1650 ft footprint, which is a safety hazard and yet the minimum distance from a house, so what makes you think this is a priority? They will claim to support individual property rights, yet they are choose winners and losers as to who has the right to their property when it comes to turbines. And even if it is highly productive soils, these boards repeatedly turn a blind eye to their own guidelines and will claim individual rights. Given a house provides more taxes I’m waging they’ll go with the additional houses not the farmland as winners here. Unless these boards start upholding the 20 year plan they created and actually look to protect the community by making it economically stable and safe, we’d save ourselves much money doing away with them.

    Like

  2. BOTTOM LINE! If the county wants to BUY the land, they can do ANYTHING they darn well please, otherwise, IT’s the LANDOWNERS business to do WHAT they want to with it. I know you need 5 acres to build on OR a pre existing structure. But WHEN and IF the county folks decide that a person NEEDS more then 40 acres to build on, then LET’S bring that rule to town and have a BIG city.. 40 acres is a decent plot and to need more then that for residential is OVERKILL unless you’re a Hunt brother who NEEDS a 5 mile long lane!! There NEEDS to be a reality check between the county people who WRITE these rules and the people who BUY the plot and KNOW how big an area this is.. SIZE DOESN’T MATTER!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s