Did the Pantagraph comply?

By:  Diane Benjamin

Below is the email (printed with permission) from the attorney for Michael Cadena to the Pantagraph reporter who included #FakeNews in her article:

I redacted her email address because it isn’t important.

The only reason I got involved in this case is because of the reporting by the Pantagraph.  Michael Cadena was sick of Brady-Lunny and contacted me.

Has the Pantagraph printed a retraction and apology?  Not that I’ve seen, but then I don’t subscribe to #FakeNews.

I think I saw a Facebook post saying the cost for 52 weeks is going up again.  The bill may say 52 weeks, keep in mind it never is.

5 thoughts on “Did the Pantagraph comply?

  1. As I pointed out a few weeks ago, related to another Paragraph outrage, Brady-Loony is scum!

  2. Did you remove your libelous story about Mayor Renner? Claiming someone is guilty before an indictment, let alone a conviction, is a textbook case of defamation. But journalistic ethics isn’t your strong suit, Diane.

Leave a Reply