Did the Pantagraph comply?

By:  Diane Benjamin

Below is the email (printed with permission) from the attorney for Michael Cadena to the Pantagraph reporter who included #FakeNews in her article:

I redacted her email address because it isn’t important.

The only reason I got involved in this case is because of the reporting by the Pantagraph.  Michael Cadena was sick of Brady-Lunny and contacted me.

Has the Pantagraph printed a retraction and apology?  Not that I’ve seen, but then I don’t subscribe to #FakeNews.

I think I saw a Facebook post saying the cost for 52 weeks is going up again.  The bill may say 52 weeks, keep in mind it never is.

Advertisements

Comments

  1. As I pointed out a few weeks ago, related to another Paragraph outrage, Brady-Loony is scum!

    Like

  2. Crimson says:

    Did you remove your libelous story about Mayor Renner? Claiming someone is guilty before an indictment, let alone a conviction, is a textbook case of defamation. But journalistic ethics isn’t your strong suit, Diane.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

. .

wordpress stats plugin
%d bloggers like this: