Skip to content
  • Please contribute
  • Obituaries
  • Climate change Hoax
  • Open the Books
  • Search – Follow

BlnNews

Written by Diane Benjamin - editorApril 14, 2017

Tari’s Transparency is a joke

By:  Diane Benjamin

One thing I’ve learned is Republicans never do what they say they will do in a campaign while Democrats lie over and over and over trying to get you to believe what they say.  Just watch them for a while, you will notice it too.  (Think:  If you like your doctor . . . )

Tari Renner did just that with his claims of transparency.  The City of Bloomington doesn’t have any transparency.  Documents are still missing from the website, even though I filed a FOIA request for many of them in March.

Example of missing Agenda from 10/24/2016:  http://www.cityblm.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=11530

Reason for this story:

The City posts a list of all FOIA request made and who submitted them.  A reader noticed the Pantagraph had submitted this request:

Requested: 03/07/2017
Due: 03/14/2017
Requested by: Edith Brady-Lunny, Pantagraph
Request:

1. E-mails sent and received by Mayor Tari Renner, City Manager David Hales and current members of the Bloomington City Council from Jan. 1, 2017 and March 6, 2017 on privately owned devices of these city officials, pursuant to Section 7 (a) of the Freedom of Information Act;

2. all City of Bloomington policies which prohibit the transaction of public business on private devices or through private e-mail accounts.

Since this FOIA requests sounds really interesting, Kevin Gerrard submitted a request for what the Pantagraph received:

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kevin Gerrard <redacted> wrote:

Pursuant to Section 7 (a) of the Freedom of information Act,  I request an electronic copy of the identical records you sent to Ms Lunny of the Pantagraph which she requested in her FOIA Request  17-03-0229 . Given the fact your response was already compiled, vetted, and sent to the requestor, I trust there will be no delay or additional redactions or vetting and that your response will be timely.

Kevin S. Gerrard

Kevin received this response

On Apr 3, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Coffey <acoffey@cityblm.org> wrote:

Hello,
No documents were gathered, provide in whole, or in part to the requester of FOIA 17-03-0229 because the City’s email system does not have the ability to track if an email was sent or received on a privately owned device.  Their request was denied in full as detailed in the response form dated March 14, 2017.  You received the same response form that was emailed to the requester.

Thanks,

Andrew Coffey
Support Staff IV
City Clerk’s Office

 

Illegal response Andrew Coffey!

Government employees can not use personal email addresses to usurp Freedom of Information requests.

Illinois AG Rules That Public Employees’ Personal Emails Are Public Records

August 15, 2016
https://www.hklaw.com/Publications/Illinois-AG-Rules-That-Public-Employees-Personal-Emails-Are-Public-Records-08-15-2016/
.
I have FOID’s personal email accounts and received the emails – the City is now denying documents they previously didn’t!
.
Is the Pantagraph pursuing legal action against the City for denying the FOIA request?
.
We don’t know – but Kevin Gerrard will!
.
One more note – the Pantagraph’s FOIA was denied before the election, but they endorsed Renner’s non-transparency anyway.
.
Nice Pantagraph!  I wonder if the Pantagraph knows the law (or cares).

 

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
  • WhatsApp

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in - - - Please Contribute - - -, BloNo, Bloomington, elections, Liberal Media, Local, Pantagraph, Progressives, Renner.Tagged CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, FOIA denial, Freedom of Informaiton Act, Pantagraph, personal email accounts, Tari Renner, transparency.

10 thoughts on “Tari’s Transparency is a joke”

  1. skunk says:
    April 14, 2017 at 9:20 am

    Kevin Gerrard should try making an FOIA request using the exact same wording as the Pantagraph reporter rather than requesting the information received by the Pantagraph. As far as policy regarding use of private emails and texts, I’m pretty sure the City doesn’t have one. In order to be transparent, one has to be honest.

    LikeLike

    Reply
    1. Diane Benjamin - editor says:
      April 14, 2017 at 9:31 am

      It’s totally legal to FOIA a previous FOIA. The City is turning into a dark place where no information is being released to the public. The next few years will be filled with lawsuits!

      LikeLike

      Reply
      1. skunk says:
        April 14, 2017 at 10:33 am

        I understand what was done is legal. Sometimes rewording gets different results. Lawsuits work too. Unfortunately, the AG office gives non-binding rulings. Has a copy of the tape from the illegal closed session been released yet?

        LikeLike

      2. Diane Benjamin - editor says:
        April 14, 2017 at 10:50 am

        Nope, but personal emails got a Binding Opinion!

        LikeLike

  2. Pingback: Open letter to the Bloomington Council – BLNNews
  3. Green Giant says:
    April 14, 2017 at 4:09 pm

    “One thing I’ve learned is Republicans never do what they say they will do in a campaign while Democrats lie over and over and over trying to get you to believe what they say”

    Isn’t it easier to say both Republicans and Democrats lie?

    LikeLike

    Reply
    1. Diane Benjamin - editor says:
      April 14, 2017 at 4:20 pm

      Sounds good to me. I’m not convinced Republicans intend to deceive, they are just spineless fools. Democrats do intend to deceive because if their plans were revealed nobody would ever vote for them.

      LikeLike

      Reply
  4. Sygg says:
    April 15, 2017 at 12:53 am

    Point of clarification, what they are saying is the email program can’t tell whether it was opened or sent on a city device or a personal device. They should of stated any emails from private accounts.

    LikeLike

    Reply
    1. mittenpaws says:
      April 15, 2017 at 8:59 pm

      Sygg-exactly right. Kevin could have reworded the request to simply ask for all email correspondences from public and private accounts.

      LikeLike

      Reply
      1. Kevin says:
        April 17, 2017 at 4:05 pm

        At this time I don’t want their public email , so I don’t need to reword anything. They are simply refusing to collect the emails from the parties I listed. They done it before, but not on this grand of a scale to the best of my knowledge. Nonetheless, they are violating the law. They have eight more business days to comply before I file with the AG’s office to force them to produce and hold them accountable for violating the AG’s previous posted ruling on this type of FOIA Request.

        LikeLike

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Please Contribute – click BLN

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

Diane Benjamin-Editor

Email: blnnews@yahoo.com

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012

Categories

.

Web
Analytics

Post navigation

Previous Post Coming soon: Utopia Crash
Next Post Open letter to the Bloomington Council
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: