By: Diane Benjamin
If you are confused about the 3 advisory questions the democrats put on the ballot to prevent a parental rights advisory question, Krystle Able thinks you should vote YES on all 3:

.
Of course unintended consequences are difficult without critical thinking skills. She also still wants Rent Control.
Krystle also posted this gem. Democrats have no problem taking money from you to fund “non-citizens”. In other words, being a citizen is meaningless in Illinois:



.
Rebuild Illinois is responsible for the $.47 gas tax. That’s an “everyday cost” that Sharon “backs”.
Eliminating the grocery tax was a meaningless vote, especially when the Town of Normal reinstated it. Did Rep Chung have an opinion of that move? There is nothing on her page asking Normal why they aren’t lowering “everyday costs”.
Bloomington claims they have no plans to do the same. Keep watching, I think they are sitting back watching how you feel about Normal doing it.
If you look at Sharon Chung’s Facebook page there is very little policy and lots of fluff.
Not on her page is unemployment is higher in Illinois than all surrounding states and the national average. The tax burden is higher in Illinois than all surrounding states. But, she’s “Fighting for You Every Day”.
https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/us-unemployment-rate-today/

.
Note: Democrats are in complete control of Illinois. They are really “fighting for” big government, not you.
Also keep in mind Chung was responsible for the bill to exempt only Normal from complying with existing laws that mandate elections for officials they don’t want elected. #Democracy

As an IL legislator – Chung is earning more than she ever has in her entire violin lesson teaching ‘life’.
Never underestimate the other womyns greed !
All she has to do is vote as told
When are you going to do a story on the county amendment to eliminate the auditor? Paying for an auditor is an enormous waste of tax money! I am sick of wasteful government spending. That is why my property taxes are so high!
I did at least a month ago. You realize they plan to appoint one? I’m sure that person will be watching your money!
I saw your comments on her a while back. You are right on the money. Will you do a piece encouraging people to vote yes to eliminate her position?
No, it doesn’t eliminate the position. It creates an unaccountable bureaucrat!
She is already unaccountable. Nobody is running against her! This is worse. At least an appointed one could be fired. I will be voting to eliminate her position, and I hope others that are concerned with government efficiency will too.
So the treasurer and unaccountable auditor get cozy. Who is verifying checks?