By: Diane Benjamin
If you did believe in term limits you would be marking every judge NO:
Voting YES is NOT going to save County taxpayers any money:
If this passes an auditor will be appointed instead of elected. Auditors have to be independent. Appointed isn’t.
The best way to take out someone who isn’t competent is in an election. Nobody bothered to run again Michelle Anderson:
If this elected position isn’t eliminated the County Board should try again to cut her salary. It was blocked a couple years ago.
Wait, I thought all Republicans were good and all Democrats were bad
Evidently you don’t pay close attention. These aren’t contended races so party doesn’t matter.
Good Judges – all will get my vote to retain.
Eliminate the Auditor – I’m voting No just because she is a never ending source of irritation to the ‘elites’. IMO that is a good thing.
How do you know who is good?
The mass coalition of Democratic support for eliminating the auditor, including the recently released stance from the League of Women Voters calling for that office’s elimination, have literally changed how I view that political effort — in that I no longer trust it. Elected representation is a good thing. If the office needs to change, RUN SOMEONE DIFFERENT instead of taking away an opportunity to vote for someone in government.