Normal got Progressivism, now pay for it

By: Diane Benjamin

Progressives believe government creates prosperity.

In Normal, that meant Uptown would magically fill with developers eager to do their bidding. Years after taxpayers were forced to fund the project, the first-floor restaurant space at 1 Uptown Circle sat empty. Two other large buildings meant to complete the circle still don’t exist after multiple developers walked away. Normal was lucky the original developer didn’t build office space right before COVID — there’s no demand for it now. Yet here come the progressives again, pushing a new TIF to lure housing developers with more taxpayer handouts.

Of course the 4-3 vote to build the underpass last night was a foregone conclusion. The same ideology now promises developers will flock to the south side of the tracks to create their version of “prosperity.” They may rethink that fantasy once Chris Koos bans natural gas lines and demands everything be all-electric. Even the UN has quietly backed off the worst climate alarmism, but local progressives don’t let facts get in the way of their agenda.

A NextDoor user recently shared an email from Trustee Karyn Smith that perfectly captures the faulty logic.

  • Grants are tax dollars. Claiming this project “costs citizens nothing” is simply a lie. That $2.5 million is still taxpayer money.
  • Anyone who eats at a restaurant in Normal is already paying more thanks to this council’s food and beverage tax hike. Out-of-town visitors aren’t covering the bill.
  • Believing these tax increases will actually sunset when the bonds are paid off is pure naivety. Progressives never sunset taxes — new projects always need new funding.
  • “If successful” is just gambling with public money. By the time results are measured, Karyn Smith and her colleagues will be long gone. And if the project flops, they’ll simply rewrite the definition of success — as progressives always do.

Read the below response from Smith. The people who bother to vote in Normal’s local elections put progressives in charge. The rest of the Town gets to pay for it.


Thank you for reaching out with your comments about the underpass. I appreciate your perspective on the Transportation Center. As to diverting the bond issue and directing those dollars to other projects, you may not be aware that government regulations require that entities may only spend funds that have been approved in their budget and passed by a majority of elected officials. If Normal does not pursue the underpass, those dollars could not go to other Town projects.

Several votes are needed to move this project forward.

An ordinance to extend the bond issue date for the $12 million bonds that were approved last fall to fund the Town’s portion of project cost. This vote is needed to provide additional time to go to the market with these bonds since the start of the project was delayed when the initial contractor cancelled their approximately three months after they were awarded the project. The $12 million bond issue Council will vote on is the same amount that was approved last fall. There is no increase in Town financing of this project.

Approval of a joint financing agreement with the Illinois Department of Transportation. IDOT has awarded Normal $2.5 million to assist in funding the engineering component of this transportation project. Normal was one of 223 projects selected to receive this money out of $400 million budgeted for this type of transportation project. The Council previously selected Clark Dietz to provide engineering work for the Underpass at a cost of $2.5 million and this IDOT grant will be applied toward the Clark Dietz engineering component of the project.

An agreement with Lumen Industries to relocate telecommunication facilities for the construction of the Underpass. The dollar amount of this is $225,000 and this amount has already been included in the Underpass budget. This vote is a formal authorization to direct these dollars be used for this relocation. This is the last utility on the Union Pacific site. All other utility relocations have already been completed.

Approval of a contract with P.J. Hoerr for $33,867,447 to construct the Underpass and related structures north and south of the tracks. When Millstone Weber withdrew from the project, Town staff began negotiating with P.J. Hoerr as they had participated in the bidding with Millstone Weber and were now eligible to be considered. It has taken some time to finalize all the details of this new contract as multiple parties were involved. Despite the hiugher bid from P.J. Hoerr, the Town’s project costs are unchanged — thanks to the IDOT funding of the $2.5 million grant for engineering portion. See the chart below:

Some people have expressed concern about that residents will be paying more taxing to support this Underpass. When the bonds were approved, the Council purposely identified food and beverage and hotel/motel tax increases as the funding mechanisms to support the debt service on the bond issue. Also, the tax increase passed for this debt service is scheduled to sunset once the bonds are paid off. It is the intention by structuring the funding of this project in this manner, visitors will be the bulk of the cost associated with this project, not Normal residents.

For several years, the Bloomington
Normal Chamber of Commerce has sponsored visits to other cities to highlight the transformational projects that other communities have pursued. Transformational projects are intended to set a community apart and provide a distinct identity that provides impetus for growth and development.

Ideally, these projects function as a joint public/private partnership. I believe that the Underpass will be an impetus for future development north and south of the tracks. If successful, new residents and businesses will be attracted to Uptown increasing the tax base without substantial increase in services as roads, sewers, utilities, and water are already in place.

It will also provide safe passage south of the tracks so that elderly and mobility challenged individuals will not be dependent on transport across the tracks at Fell or Linden or risk catching a cane or walker in the tracks.

All of these items will be discussed at Monday’s Council meeting. If you wish your voice to go on record, you are invited to register for the public comment before the meeting either by email or in-person sign-up provided you sign up before 6:45 p.m. I expect there to be a lively discussion of all views regarding the underpass and I encourage you to attend in person or view on YouTube or Facebook.

Again, thank you for reaching out with your thoughts on this project.

Karyn Smith

6 thoughts on “Normal got Progressivism, now pay for it

  1. I have no issue with you opposing the underpass. I also agree its a waste of money. But, I will say that it is frustrating to see how selective Republicans are in their outrage. They are always quick to criticize people on the left for wasteful spending, yet they never seem to hold their own politicians responsible. I see that with most Republicans acquiesing to Trump’s demand for 1 billion dollars for Trump’s totally unnecessary ballroom. Or, the 1.8 million dollar resurfacing that Trump turned into 13 million dollars by handing out a no-bid contract to a company doing shoddy work. Or, accepting a plane from a middle eastern country that we’ve spent hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to turn into Trump’s new plane as president while a new Air Force One is already already in the process of being built. Or the 1.5 billion dollar slushfund Trump created with the DOJ to pay out his allies and people who were found guilty by juries of their peers for vandalize and defacing the Capital on Jan. 6. Also, how many millions of dollars are being paid in taxpayer dollars are being paid to prepare the white house for an unnecessary UFC fight? How much is Trump asking for to build his gaudy and unnecessary arch? I could go on. Point is- all this accounts for BILLIONS of dollars of more waste than the underpass- which I agree is also wasteful.

    And this is not meant to troll- I genuinely find the focus on uptown and local TIFS really frustrating and would welcome Republican scrutiny of their own. And this isn’t a “hate trump” post either- Republicans turned a blind eye under Bush as well. The silly, unnecessary federal vanity projects just seem to be the highest under this Trump term compared to any other president this century.

    I’d like to eliminate ALL wasteful federal, state, and local spending.

  2. I reached out to the council and got a nearly identical response from Ms. Smith. Glad to see they all got their talking points together before the vote.

    I’ve got to say tho, this isn’t progressivism. This is the same brand of politics that we see from the White House: a class of leaders who won’t be alive to deal with the consequences of their actions, a subservient political underclass willing to sign the checks, and news outlets that will gladly go along to get along. If you want to see what progressivism looks like, check out NYC.

  3. Like all I sure am concerned about what is going on nationally but this site lets us know what is happening locally and sure would be nice if people locally would voice outrage over how their taxes are being fleeced and used locally
    The tunnel is a total waste of money and is not needed it’s quite obvious that your mayor is looking for a way to establish his legacy
    And just like the colosseum in Bloomington those that approved that boondoggle are either dead or gone and we the taxpayers are stuck paying for it
    The same will happen in Normal so stop trying to ignore what is going on locally by only focusing on national problems.
    Illinois which includes local are now the highest in the country for taxes demoncrats run the state and local yes demoncrats so maybe many of you should focus more of your comments to local stuff!!!!

  4. About the only way to fill the empty space with retail and restuarants is when the politician’s come to reality and focus on reducing or eliminating property taxes. Those taxes and others are driving businesses away. Instead they keep digging the hole deeper and piling more debt onto the taxpayer aka citizens. They silently dip into your wallet with their gas taxes, sales taxes, etc. Something you rarely tally to see just exactly how much they are taking.

    I haven’t seen much outrage by the Democrats for the fraud into the billions committed in blue states either. Way more than a ballroom, etc. Today I saw were CA, a blue state, is lagging in COVID payments back to the federal government. I didn’t look to see how many billions that would be.

    I don’t disagree that the Republican’s should have stopped the ballroom and should have put guardrails around it, finance and construction. Is it needed, I think it is. There is just too much security risk holding large venues at the WH in an open area on the WH grounds. Presidential security from the 1950’s WH era construction is inadequate.

    1. Ballroom is paid for without taxes. The billion if for 3 stories under it housing security technology. Trump will never use any of it because it won’t be done. Outdated security is there now

Leave a Reply