By: Diane Benjamin
All of the campaign contributions below were made by the same person. Yes, I asked the person by email if all of these are legitimate. Of course I didn’t receive a response – no surprise. Eventually I will be revealing who it is.
Meanwhile, if you have ever made a contribution via ActBlue, check if your record is accurate: https://www.fec.gov/data/
Click on: Find contributions from specific individuals
People actually contribute $2.00? Look at the dates. $5.00 on the same day $50.00 is donated?
Obviously, thinking one can understand what’s going on in the mind of a hard-core Democrat is iffy at best, but here are my best guesses:
– $5 on the same day as $50 could be a typo – “$5? I meant to give $50!” Or $50 earmarked for one candidate or cause and the $5 earmarked elsewhere, in line with the $2 strategy below.
– $2 donations Could be a typo, but seems to me more of a planned approach having to do with the number of contributions made, whether virtue signalling within the ActBlue community or enabling a given candidate to say “My campaign has received X thousand donations, most of them under $10!” to camouflage the fact that they’re bought and paid for by a small number of big donors.
While we’re looking at donations, I should point out that focus on the midterms is entirely appropriate, now is the time (actually Past time) to start thinking about next April’s Local elections. We need candidates, and those candidates (will) need money. Do you think our leftist boot camps should be turned back into schools? Dismayed that local government that doesn’t give a rat’s rumpus what the average resident thinks? Sick of ever-increasing property taxes? Tired of paying a newly-appointed and generously-paid leftist lackey to do the job of an Also generously-paid Township Supervisor so they can ‘phone it in’ and focus instead on creating lies and propaganda?
* Donate to *, ** Recruit **, or *** Become *** a local-race candidate!
$2 might be because they checked a box to cover the processing fee that isn’t the high
Im not sure what you’re implying in this post. Are you trying to say ACT Blue or the contributor is doing something nefarious?
As on most contribution platforms, you can set recurring monthly contributions to candidates or causes. Looks like that person has recurring monthly contributions of 10 and of 2 dollars, possibly to the same candidate, but most likely to different candidates or causes.
There’s nothing weird or untoward about those contributions at all.
Why are they under federal investigation?
Oh, you got ’em! Not like the DOJ has been launching frivelous investigations or anything!
Sure. Keep believing that
Um, so you think James Comey should be indicted for arranging seashells on the beach that say “8647”? I thought you believed in free speech? I guess not.
People right here are calling from Trump to die. The left need mental institutions to come back.
Okay, so if you construe “8647” as a threat to kill Trump and the indictment justifiable, you would have been fine with Biden’s justice department indicting Republicans for saying “Fuck Joe Biden” because that could be construed as a threat to rape Biden? Correct? Im just going off of your own logic here.
Means kill?
With Trump’s history and inability to release rhe Epstein files, I know Republicans are murky on this front, but believe it or not rape is a crime, just like murder. So if “8647” can be construed as an intent to commission a murder, “Fuck Joe Biden” can be construed to be an intent to commission a rape.
It’s hilarious that people think anything is left in the files after both parties had them for years. If they had anything on Trump Kamala would have used it.
Riiiight. Im sure they’re not holding back and reacting documents involving Trump. 😂 Still havent answered my question though. Would you have been fine with Bidens DOJ indicting Republicans for saying “Fuck Joe Biden” as that can be construed as an intent to rape Biden. Thats using the same logic as in the Comey indictment- just a different crime being “commissioned” by the speech.. If yes, yea! You’re logically consistent. If the answer is no because you think that would have been a ridiculous and frivelous indictment, you have to admit what Trump’s DOJ is doing is ridiculous and frivelous.
F*** doesn’t mean murder
Yeah, I know that Diane. Thats why I said rape not murder. And raping people, just like murder, is illegal. Are you intentionally this dense?
Playing with you is over. Delete button ready
TTFA,You need to include in your analogy the billboard erected by the left that read f%#k ice, could this also mean that they just want to rape the ice agents? Just saying!